- A man raped a girl.
The societal reaction: God will send someone to rape his daughters. - A man deceived and oppressed a girl.
Tomorrow God will send someone to oppress his daughter or sister. - A man wronged his wife.
Tomorrow God will send someone to wrong his daughters. - A man deceived a girl and broke her heart.
Tomorrow God will take revenge on him through his daughters; He grants respite but does not neglect.
I do not know how long this flawed interpretation will continue! What is the connection of the female—be it a daughter, sister, wife, or mother—to a shameful act committed by the man?
Why doesn't the consequence fall back on him instead of being taken out on someone else? If he raped a girl, why don't you say: "Someone will come to rape him"?
Isn't he the one who committed these violations? Therefore, he is the one who must pay the price.
His sister, mother, daughter, and wife have nothing to do with what he does.
Why do you portray the female as if she must be an expiator for the man's mistakes? She has her own identity and is held accountable for her own mistakes, not for the mistakes of those under whose guardianship she remains.
You find that the woman herself denounces what the man did and disavows it, yet she is expected to pay the price! They even gloat over her if harm befalls her, viewing it as divine retribution for her relative's actions.
"And no bearer of burdens shall bear another's burden"
Do you not read the Quran?!
When a woman wrongs someone, why don't we hear them say: "Tomorrow God will send someone to wrong her son, husband, or father"? Why is it only the female who must pay the price?!
Every human being is held accountable for what they themselves did and is not punished for the actions of others. Remember the words of the Almighty: "And every one of them will come to Him on the Day of Resurrection alone" [Maryam 95].