The atheist, "in my personal opinion," is divided into three categories:
The First: The Great Scholar
This is the person who was not convinced by religions, so they closed the chapter on religions and focused all their attention on what benefits them through research, science, and other pursuits.
The Second: The Moderate Atheist
They are somewhat similar to the first type. This type is characterized by being a debater who respects the other's opinion and differences. They respect their friends from all backgrounds, and as for their articles, they are diverse; occasionally, they critique religions in some of their writings.
The Third: The "Cheap" Atheist (Friday Market Type)
This type differs radically from the previous ones. They possess neither thought nor any substance. They heard that religions are human-made, and simply said, "Oh yes, that's true." They focus all their interest and articles on mockery and derision of religions—"Islam exclusively"—as if mockery of religions is one of the pillars of atheism.
They want to live their lives without any rules or prohibitions, so they found that atheism achieves that for them. This type does not respect those who differ with them in opinion; instead, they despise all religious people, and to be honest, they specifically despise only Muslims.
This third type is a burden on the previous types because they are counted among them.
The first and second types are people of thought, and I respect them because they discuss issues objectively and respect those who disagree with them. Meanwhile, the "cheap" type does not respect those who differ with them and always has swearing and insults on their tongue.
Victory in their eyes is mocking Islam "exclusively" as much as possible. The problem is that all the arguments they present are naive and foolish, offering nothing of value. They believe victory is mockery of Islam only, yet they do not dare to critique any other religion.
They essentially understood nothing of atheism except its name, believing that atheism is a trend! This type specifically, if a calamity strikes them, they cry out, "O Lord, O Lord," meaning they are an atheist only as long as they are not suffering.
Conclusion:
Intellectual diversity among atheists reflects the complexity of the contemporary cultural landscape.
While we find in the first and second types a model for rational dialogue and objective thinking, the third type represents a negative phenomenon that harms both atheism and the dialogue between religions and sects.
Mutual respect and constructive critical thinking are the foundations of any fruitful dialogue, regardless of ideological differences.
Therefore, to the "cheap" type: take it easy on us, because honestly, no one is really paying attention to you.